[JFFS2] Locking issues in summary write code.

We can't use jffs2_scan_dirty_space() because it doesn't do any locking; it's
only for use at scan time -- hence the 'scan' in the name.

Also, don't allocate refs while we have c->erase_completion_lock held.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
David Woodhouse 2006-05-21 13:15:59 +01:00
parent 9167e0f811
commit 010b06d6d0

View file

@ -835,19 +835,32 @@ static int jffs2_sum_write_data(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_eraseblock
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
ret = jffs2_flash_writev(c, vecs, 2, jeb->offset + c->sector_size -
jeb->free_size, &retlen, 0);
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
if (ret || (retlen != infosize)) {
struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *ref;
JFFS2_WARNING("Write of %u bytes at 0x%08x failed. returned %d, retlen %zd\n",
infosize, jeb->offset + c->sector_size - jeb->free_size, ret, retlen);
/* Waste remaining space */
ref = jffs2_alloc_raw_node_ref();
if (ref) {
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
ref->flash_offset = jeb->offset + c->sector_size - jeb->free_size;
ref->flash_offset |= REF_OBSOLETE;
ref->next_in_ino = 0;
jffs2_link_node_ref(c, jeb, ref, c->sector_size - jeb->free_size);
}
c->summary->sum_size = JFFS2_SUMMARY_NOSUM_SIZE;
jffs2_scan_dirty_space(c, jeb, infosize);
return 1;
}
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
return 0;
}
@ -890,7 +903,6 @@ int jffs2_sum_write_sumnode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
/* for ACCT_PARANOIA_CHECK */
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
summary_ref = jffs2_alloc_raw_node_ref();
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
if (!summary_ref) {
JFFS2_NOTICE("Failed to allocate node ref for summary\n");
@ -900,6 +912,7 @@ int jffs2_sum_write_sumnode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
summary_ref->next_in_ino = NULL;
summary_ref->flash_offset = (jeb->offset + c->sector_size - jeb->free_size) | REF_NORMAL;
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
jffs2_link_node_ref(c, jeb, summary_ref, infosize);
return 0;