From 0992b79577ea820840844b7c16385a1ad9d5955c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nickolai Zeldovich <nickolai@csail.mit.edu> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:58:28 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] net/xfrm/xfrm_replay: avoid division by zero All of the xfrm_replay->advance functions in xfrm_replay.c check if x->replay_esn->replay_window is zero (and return if so). However, one of them, xfrm_replay_advance_bmp(), divides by that value (in the '%' operator) before doing the check, which can potentially trigger a divide-by-zero exception. Some compilers will also assume that the earlier division means the value cannot be zero later, and thus will eliminate the subsequent zero check as dead code. This patch moves the division to after the check. Signed-off-by: Nickolai Zeldovich <nickolai@csail.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Change-Id: I0a8ed8f8a3ccc89e3081c5c94ac67a0c70670529 --- net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c index 765f6fe951eb..35754cc8a9e5 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c @@ -242,11 +242,13 @@ static void xfrm_replay_advance_bmp(struct xfrm_state *x, __be32 net_seq) u32 diff; struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_esn = x->replay_esn; u32 seq = ntohl(net_seq); - u32 pos = (replay_esn->seq - 1) % replay_esn->replay_window; + u32 pos; if (!replay_esn->replay_window) return; + pos = (replay_esn->seq - 1) % replay_esn->replay_window; + if (seq > replay_esn->seq) { diff = seq - replay_esn->seq;