From 22b1c30792cfd5da151f0ba47d2e66d3ea760b96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 16:04:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] 9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC commit a84b69cb6e0a41e86bc593904faa6def3b957343 upstream. If we'd already sent a request and decide to abort it, we *must* issue TFLUSH properly and not just blindly reuse the tag, or we'll get seriously screwed when response eventually arrives and we confuse it for response to later request that had reused the same tag. Signed-off-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Zefan Li --- net/9p/client.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c index b23a17c431c8..32df0a3de277 100644 --- a/net/9p/client.c +++ b/net/9p/client.c @@ -833,7 +833,8 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, if (err < 0) { if (err == -EIO) c->status = Disconnected; - goto reterr; + if (err != -ERESTARTSYS) + goto reterr; } if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_ERROR) { p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "req_status error %d\n", req->t_err);