drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

commit 0d8957c8a9 upstream.

We may only start to set up the new register values after having
confirmed that the ring is truely off. Otherwise the hw might lose the
newly written register values. This is caught later on in the init
sequence, when we check whether the register writes have stuck.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50522
Tested-by: Yang Guang <guang.a.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Vetter 2012-08-07 09:54:14 +02:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 1a475b7af6
commit 57ecc93ce6

View file

@ -258,8 +258,6 @@ static int init_ring_common(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
I915_WRITE_HEAD(ring, 0);
ring->write_tail(ring, 0);
/* Initialize the ring. */
I915_WRITE_START(ring, obj->gtt_offset);
head = I915_READ_HEAD(ring) & HEAD_ADDR;
/* G45 ring initialization fails to reset head to zero */
@ -285,6 +283,11 @@ static int init_ring_common(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
}
}
/* Initialize the ring. This must happen _after_ we've cleared the ring
* registers with the above sequence (the readback of the HEAD registers
* also enforces ordering), otherwise the hw might lose the new ring
* register values. */
I915_WRITE_START(ring, obj->gtt_offset);
I915_WRITE_CTL(ring,
((ring->size - PAGE_SIZE) & RING_NR_PAGES)
| RING_VALID);