mirror of
https://github.com/followmsi/android_kernel_google_msm.git
synced 2024-11-06 23:17:41 +00:00
8564b84a62
I've seen a fair number of issues with kswapd and other processes
appearing to get stuck in v3.12-rc. Using sysrq-p many times seems to
indicate that it gets stuck somewhere in list_lru_walk_node(), called
from prune_icache_sb() and super_cache_scan().
I never seem to be able to trigger a calltrace for functions above that
point.
So I decided to add the following to super_cache_scan():
@@ -81,10 +81,14 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
inodes = list_lru_count_node(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc->nid);
dentries = list_lru_count_node(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc->nid);
total_objects = dentries + inodes + fs_objects + 1;
+printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu total %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes, total_objects);
/* proportion the scan between the caches */
dentries = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, dentries, total_objects);
inodes = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, inodes, total_objects);
+printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes);
+BUG_ON(dentries == 0);
+BUG_ON(inodes == 0);
/*
* prune the dcache first as the icache is pinned by it, then
@@ -99,7 +103,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
freed += sb->s_op->free_cached_objects(sb, fs_objects,
sc->nid);
}
-
+printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu freed %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes, freed);
drop_super(sb);
return freed;
}
and shortly thereafter, having applied some pressure, I got this:
update-apt-xapi:1616: super_cache_scan: dentries 25632 inodes 2 total 25635
update-apt-xapi:1616: super_cache_scan: dentries 1023 inodes 0
------------[ cut here ]------------
Kernel BUG at c0101994 [verbose debug info unavailable]
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#3] SMP ARM
Modules linked in: fuse rfcomm bnep bluetooth hid_cypress
CPU: 0 PID: 1616 Comm: update-apt-xapi Tainted: G D 3.12.0-rc7+ #154
task: daea1200 ti: c3bf8000 task.ti: c3bf8000
PC is at super_cache_scan+0x1c0/0x278
LR is at trace_hardirqs_on+0x14/0x18
Process update-apt-xapi (pid: 1616, stack limit = 0xc3bf8240)
...
Backtrace:
(super_cache_scan) from [<c00cd69c>] (shrink_slab+0x254/0x4c8)
(shrink_slab) from [<c00d09a0>] (try_to_free_pages+0x3a0/0x5e0)
(try_to_free_pages) from [<c00c59cc>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5)
(__alloc_pages_nodemask) from [<c00e07c0>] (__pte_alloc+0x2c/0x13)
(__pte_alloc) from [<c00e3a70>] (handle_mm_fault+0x84c/0x914)
(handle_mm_fault) from [<c001a4cc>] (do_page_fault+0x1f0/0x3bc)
(do_page_fault) from [<c001a7b0>] (do_translation_fault+0xac/0xb8)
(do_translation_fault) from [<c000840c>] (do_DataAbort+0x38/0xa0)
(do_DataAbort) from [<c00133f8>] (__dabt_usr+0x38/0x40)
Notice that we had a very low number of inodes, which were reduced to
zero my mult_frac().
Now, prune_icache_sb() calls list_lru_walk_node() passing that number of
inodes (0) into that as the number of objects to scan:
long prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
int nid)
{
LIST_HEAD(freeable);
long freed;
freed = list_lru_walk_node(&sb->s_inode_lru, nid, inode_lru_isolate,
&freeable, &nr_to_scan);
which does:
unsigned long
list_lru_walk_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
void *cb_arg, unsigned long *nr_to_walk)
{
struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
struct list_head *item, *n;
unsigned long isolated = 0;
spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
restart:
list_for_each_safe(item, n, &nlru->list) {
enum lru_status ret;
/*
* decrement nr_to_walk first so that we don't livelock if we
* get stuck on large numbesr of LRU_RETRY items
*/
if (--(*nr_to_walk) == 0)
break;
So, if *nr_to_walk was zero when this function was entered, that means
we're wanting to operate on (~0UL)+1 objects - which might as well be
infinite.
Clearly this is not correct behaviour. If we think about the behaviour
of this function when *nr_to_walk is 1, then clearly it's wrong - we
decrement first and then test for zero - which results in us doing
nothing at all. A post-decrement would give the desired behaviour -
we'd try to walk one object and one object only if *nr_to_walk were one.
It also gives the correct behaviour for zero - we exit at this point.
Fixes:
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
backing-dev.c | ||
bootmem.c | ||
bounce.c | ||
cleancache.c | ||
compaction.c | ||
debug-pagealloc.c | ||
dmapool.c | ||
fadvise.c | ||
failslab.c | ||
filemap.c | ||
filemap_xip.c | ||
fremap.c | ||
highmem.c | ||
huge_memory.c | ||
hugetlb.c | ||
hwpoison-inject.c | ||
init-mm.c | ||
internal.h | ||
Kconfig | ||
Kconfig.debug | ||
kmemcheck.c | ||
kmemleak-test.c | ||
kmemleak.c | ||
ksm.c | ||
list_lru.c | ||
maccess.c | ||
madvise.c | ||
Makefile | ||
memblock.c | ||
memcontrol.c | ||
memory-failure.c | ||
memory.c | ||
memory_hotplug.c | ||
mempolicy.c | ||
mempool.c | ||
migrate.c | ||
mincore.c | ||
mlock.c | ||
mm_init.c | ||
mmap.c | ||
mmu_context.c | ||
mmu_notifier.c | ||
mmzone.c | ||
mprotect.c | ||
mremap.c | ||
msync.c | ||
nobootmem.c | ||
nommu.c | ||
oom_kill.c | ||
page-writeback.c | ||
page_alloc.c | ||
page_cgroup.c | ||
page_io.c | ||
page_isolation.c | ||
pagewalk.c | ||
percpu-km.c | ||
percpu-vm.c | ||
percpu.c | ||
pgtable-generic.c | ||
prio_tree.c | ||
process_vm_access.c | ||
quicklist.c | ||
readahead.c | ||
rmap.c | ||
shmem.c | ||
slab.c | ||
slob.c | ||
slub.c | ||
sparse-vmemmap.c | ||
sparse.c | ||
swap.c | ||
swap_state.c | ||
swapfile.c | ||
thrash.c | ||
truncate.c | ||
util.c | ||
vmalloc.c | ||
vmscan.c | ||
vmstat.c | ||
zpool.c | ||
zsmalloc.c |