mirror of
https://github.com/S3NEO/android_kernel_samsung_msm8226.git
synced 2024-11-07 03:47:13 +00:00
sched: Add documentation for bandwidth control
Basic description of usage and effect for CFS Bandwidth Control. Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110721184758.498036116@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d8b4986d3d
commit
88ebc08ea9
1 changed files with 122 additions and 0 deletions
122
Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.txt
Normal file
122
Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.txt
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
|
|||
CFS Bandwidth Control
|
||||
=====================
|
||||
|
||||
[ This document only discusses CPU bandwidth control for SCHED_NORMAL.
|
||||
The SCHED_RT case is covered in Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt ]
|
||||
|
||||
CFS bandwidth control is a CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED extension which allows the
|
||||
specification of the maximum CPU bandwidth available to a group or hierarchy.
|
||||
|
||||
The bandwidth allowed for a group is specified using a quota and period. Within
|
||||
each given "period" (microseconds), a group is allowed to consume only up to
|
||||
"quota" microseconds of CPU time. When the CPU bandwidth consumption of a
|
||||
group exceeds this limit (for that period), the tasks belonging to its
|
||||
hierarchy will be throttled and are not allowed to run again until the next
|
||||
period.
|
||||
|
||||
A group's unused runtime is globally tracked, being refreshed with quota units
|
||||
above at each period boundary. As threads consume this bandwidth it is
|
||||
transferred to cpu-local "silos" on a demand basis. The amount transferred
|
||||
within each of these updates is tunable and described as the "slice".
|
||||
|
||||
Management
|
||||
----------
|
||||
Quota and period are managed within the cpu subsystem via cgroupfs.
|
||||
|
||||
cpu.cfs_quota_us: the total available run-time within a period (in microseconds)
|
||||
cpu.cfs_period_us: the length of a period (in microseconds)
|
||||
cpu.stat: exports throttling statistics [explained further below]
|
||||
|
||||
The default values are:
|
||||
cpu.cfs_period_us=100ms
|
||||
cpu.cfs_quota=-1
|
||||
|
||||
A value of -1 for cpu.cfs_quota_us indicates that the group does not have any
|
||||
bandwidth restriction in place, such a group is described as an unconstrained
|
||||
bandwidth group. This represents the traditional work-conserving behavior for
|
||||
CFS.
|
||||
|
||||
Writing any (valid) positive value(s) will enact the specified bandwidth limit.
|
||||
The minimum quota allowed for the quota or period is 1ms. There is also an
|
||||
upper bound on the period length of 1s. Additional restrictions exist when
|
||||
bandwidth limits are used in a hierarchical fashion, these are explained in
|
||||
more detail below.
|
||||
|
||||
Writing any negative value to cpu.cfs_quota_us will remove the bandwidth limit
|
||||
and return the group to an unconstrained state once more.
|
||||
|
||||
Any updates to a group's bandwidth specification will result in it becoming
|
||||
unthrottled if it is in a constrained state.
|
||||
|
||||
System wide settings
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
For efficiency run-time is transferred between the global pool and CPU local
|
||||
"silos" in a batch fashion. This greatly reduces global accounting pressure
|
||||
on large systems. The amount transferred each time such an update is required
|
||||
is described as the "slice".
|
||||
|
||||
This is tunable via procfs:
|
||||
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice_us (default=5ms)
|
||||
|
||||
Larger slice values will reduce transfer overheads, while smaller values allow
|
||||
for more fine-grained consumption.
|
||||
|
||||
Statistics
|
||||
----------
|
||||
A group's bandwidth statistics are exported via 3 fields in cpu.stat.
|
||||
|
||||
cpu.stat:
|
||||
- nr_periods: Number of enforcement intervals that have elapsed.
|
||||
- nr_throttled: Number of times the group has been throttled/limited.
|
||||
- throttled_time: The total time duration (in nanoseconds) for which entities
|
||||
of the group have been throttled.
|
||||
|
||||
This interface is read-only.
|
||||
|
||||
Hierarchical considerations
|
||||
---------------------------
|
||||
The interface enforces that an individual entity's bandwidth is always
|
||||
attainable, that is: max(c_i) <= C. However, over-subscription in the
|
||||
aggregate case is explicitly allowed to enable work-conserving semantics
|
||||
within a hierarchy.
|
||||
e.g. \Sum (c_i) may exceed C
|
||||
[ Where C is the parent's bandwidth, and c_i its children ]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
There are two ways in which a group may become throttled:
|
||||
a. it fully consumes its own quota within a period
|
||||
b. a parent's quota is fully consumed within its period
|
||||
|
||||
In case b) above, even though the child may have runtime remaining it will not
|
||||
be allowed to until the parent's runtime is refreshed.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples
|
||||
--------
|
||||
1. Limit a group to 1 CPU worth of runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
If period is 250ms and quota is also 250ms, the group will get
|
||||
1 CPU worth of runtime every 250ms.
|
||||
|
||||
# echo 250000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us /* quota = 250ms */
|
||||
# echo 250000 > cpu.cfs_period_us /* period = 250ms */
|
||||
|
||||
2. Limit a group to 2 CPUs worth of runtime on a multi-CPU machine.
|
||||
|
||||
With 500ms period and 1000ms quota, the group can get 2 CPUs worth of
|
||||
runtime every 500ms.
|
||||
|
||||
# echo 1000000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us /* quota = 1000ms */
|
||||
# echo 500000 > cpu.cfs_period_us /* period = 500ms */
|
||||
|
||||
The larger period here allows for increased burst capacity.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Limit a group to 20% of 1 CPU.
|
||||
|
||||
With 50ms period, 10ms quota will be equivalent to 20% of 1 CPU.
|
||||
|
||||
# echo 10000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us /* quota = 10ms */
|
||||
# echo 50000 > cpu.cfs_period_us /* period = 50ms */
|
||||
|
||||
By using a small period here we are ensuring a consistent latency
|
||||
response at the expense of burst capacity.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue