android_kernel_samsung_msm8976/lib/int_sqrt.c

42 lines
679 B
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

lib/int_sqrt.c: optimize square root algorithm Optimize the current version of the shift-and-subtract (hardware) algorithm, described by John von Newmann[1] and Guy L Steele. Iterating 1,000,000 times, perf shows for the current version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-curr' (10 runs): 27.170996 task-clock # 0.979 CPUs utilized ( +- 3.19% ) 3 context-switches # 0.103 K/sec ( +- 4.76% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.004 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec ( +- 0.16% ) 64,921,199 cycles # 2.389 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) 28,967,789 stalled-cycles-frontend # 44.62% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.18% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 104,502,623 instructions # 1.61 insns per cycle # 0.28 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.00% ) 34,088,368 branches # 1254.587 M/sec ( +- 0.00% ) 4,901 branch-misses # 0.01% of all branches ( +- 1.32% ) 0.027763015 seconds time elapsed ( +- 3.22% ) And for the new version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-new' (10 runs): 0.496869 task-clock # 0.519 CPUs utilized ( +- 2.38% ) 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec 0 cpu-migrations # 0.403 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.209 M/sec ( +- 0.15% ) 590,760 cycles # 1.189 GHz ( +- 2.35% ) 395,053 stalled-cycles-frontend # 66.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 3.67% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 398,963 instructions # 0.68 insns per cycle # 0.99 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.39% ) 70,228 branches # 141.341 M/sec ( +- 0.36% ) 3,364 branch-misses # 4.79% of all branches ( +- 5.45% ) 0.000957440 seconds time elapsed ( +- 2.42% ) Furthermore, this saves space in instruction text: text data bss dec hex filename 111 0 0 111 6f lib/int_sqrt-baseline.o 89 0 0 89 59 lib/int_sqrt.o [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Draft_of_a_Report_on_the_EDVAC Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Tested-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-04-29 23:18:09 +00:00
/*
* Copyright (C) 2013 Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
*
* Based on the shift-and-subtract algorithm for computing integer
* square root from Guy L. Steele.
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
/**
* int_sqrt - rough approximation to sqrt
* @x: integer of which to calculate the sqrt
*
* A very rough approximation to the sqrt() function.
*/
unsigned long int_sqrt(unsigned long x)
{
lib/int_sqrt.c: optimize square root algorithm Optimize the current version of the shift-and-subtract (hardware) algorithm, described by John von Newmann[1] and Guy L Steele. Iterating 1,000,000 times, perf shows for the current version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-curr' (10 runs): 27.170996 task-clock # 0.979 CPUs utilized ( +- 3.19% ) 3 context-switches # 0.103 K/sec ( +- 4.76% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.004 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec ( +- 0.16% ) 64,921,199 cycles # 2.389 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) 28,967,789 stalled-cycles-frontend # 44.62% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.18% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 104,502,623 instructions # 1.61 insns per cycle # 0.28 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.00% ) 34,088,368 branches # 1254.587 M/sec ( +- 0.00% ) 4,901 branch-misses # 0.01% of all branches ( +- 1.32% ) 0.027763015 seconds time elapsed ( +- 3.22% ) And for the new version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-new' (10 runs): 0.496869 task-clock # 0.519 CPUs utilized ( +- 2.38% ) 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec 0 cpu-migrations # 0.403 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.209 M/sec ( +- 0.15% ) 590,760 cycles # 1.189 GHz ( +- 2.35% ) 395,053 stalled-cycles-frontend # 66.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 3.67% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 398,963 instructions # 0.68 insns per cycle # 0.99 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.39% ) 70,228 branches # 141.341 M/sec ( +- 0.36% ) 3,364 branch-misses # 4.79% of all branches ( +- 5.45% ) 0.000957440 seconds time elapsed ( +- 2.42% ) Furthermore, this saves space in instruction text: text data bss dec hex filename 111 0 0 111 6f lib/int_sqrt-baseline.o 89 0 0 89 59 lib/int_sqrt.o [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Draft_of_a_Report_on_the_EDVAC Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Tested-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-04-29 23:18:09 +00:00
unsigned long b, m, y = 0;
lib/int_sqrt.c: optimize square root algorithm Optimize the current version of the shift-and-subtract (hardware) algorithm, described by John von Newmann[1] and Guy L Steele. Iterating 1,000,000 times, perf shows for the current version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-curr' (10 runs): 27.170996 task-clock # 0.979 CPUs utilized ( +- 3.19% ) 3 context-switches # 0.103 K/sec ( +- 4.76% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.004 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec ( +- 0.16% ) 64,921,199 cycles # 2.389 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) 28,967,789 stalled-cycles-frontend # 44.62% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.18% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 104,502,623 instructions # 1.61 insns per cycle # 0.28 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.00% ) 34,088,368 branches # 1254.587 M/sec ( +- 0.00% ) 4,901 branch-misses # 0.01% of all branches ( +- 1.32% ) 0.027763015 seconds time elapsed ( +- 3.22% ) And for the new version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-new' (10 runs): 0.496869 task-clock # 0.519 CPUs utilized ( +- 2.38% ) 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec 0 cpu-migrations # 0.403 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.209 M/sec ( +- 0.15% ) 590,760 cycles # 1.189 GHz ( +- 2.35% ) 395,053 stalled-cycles-frontend # 66.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 3.67% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 398,963 instructions # 0.68 insns per cycle # 0.99 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.39% ) 70,228 branches # 141.341 M/sec ( +- 0.36% ) 3,364 branch-misses # 4.79% of all branches ( +- 5.45% ) 0.000957440 seconds time elapsed ( +- 2.42% ) Furthermore, this saves space in instruction text: text data bss dec hex filename 111 0 0 111 6f lib/int_sqrt-baseline.o 89 0 0 89 59 lib/int_sqrt.o [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Draft_of_a_Report_on_the_EDVAC Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Tested-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-04-29 23:18:09 +00:00
if (x <= 1)
return x;
lib/int_sqrt.c: optimize square root algorithm Optimize the current version of the shift-and-subtract (hardware) algorithm, described by John von Newmann[1] and Guy L Steele. Iterating 1,000,000 times, perf shows for the current version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-curr' (10 runs): 27.170996 task-clock # 0.979 CPUs utilized ( +- 3.19% ) 3 context-switches # 0.103 K/sec ( +- 4.76% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.004 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec ( +- 0.16% ) 64,921,199 cycles # 2.389 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) 28,967,789 stalled-cycles-frontend # 44.62% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.18% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 104,502,623 instructions # 1.61 insns per cycle # 0.28 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.00% ) 34,088,368 branches # 1254.587 M/sec ( +- 0.00% ) 4,901 branch-misses # 0.01% of all branches ( +- 1.32% ) 0.027763015 seconds time elapsed ( +- 3.22% ) And for the new version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-new' (10 runs): 0.496869 task-clock # 0.519 CPUs utilized ( +- 2.38% ) 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec 0 cpu-migrations # 0.403 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.209 M/sec ( +- 0.15% ) 590,760 cycles # 1.189 GHz ( +- 2.35% ) 395,053 stalled-cycles-frontend # 66.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 3.67% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 398,963 instructions # 0.68 insns per cycle # 0.99 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.39% ) 70,228 branches # 141.341 M/sec ( +- 0.36% ) 3,364 branch-misses # 4.79% of all branches ( +- 5.45% ) 0.000957440 seconds time elapsed ( +- 2.42% ) Furthermore, this saves space in instruction text: text data bss dec hex filename 111 0 0 111 6f lib/int_sqrt-baseline.o 89 0 0 89 59 lib/int_sqrt.o [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Draft_of_a_Report_on_the_EDVAC Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Tested-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-04-29 23:18:09 +00:00
m = 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 2);
lib/int_sqrt: optimize small argument commit 3f3295709edea6268ff1609855f498035286af73 upstream. The current int_sqrt() computation is sub-optimal for the case of small @x. Which is the interesting case when we're going to do cumulative distribution functions on idle times, which we assume to be a random variable, where the target residency of the deepest idle state gives an upper bound on the variable (5e6ns on recent Intel chips). In the case of small @x, the compute loop: while (m != 0) { b = y + m; y >>= 1; if (x >= b) { x -= b; y += m; } m >>= 2; } can be reduced to: while (m > x) m >>= 2; Because y==0, b==m and until x>=m y will remain 0. And while this is computationally equivalent, it runs much faster because there's less code, in particular less branches. cycles: branches: branch-misses: OLD: hot: 45.109444 +- 0.044117 44.333392 +- 0.002254 0.018723 +- 0.000593 cold: 187.737379 +- 0.156678 44.333407 +- 0.002254 6.272844 +- 0.004305 PRE: hot: 67.937492 +- 0.064124 66.999535 +- 0.000488 0.066720 +- 0.001113 cold: 232.004379 +- 0.332811 66.999527 +- 0.000488 6.914634 +- 0.006568 POST: hot: 43.633557 +- 0.034373 45.333132 +- 0.002277 0.023529 +- 0.000681 cold: 207.438411 +- 0.125840 45.333132 +- 0.002277 6.976486 +- 0.004219 Averages computed over all values <128k using a LFSR to generate order. Cold numbers have a LFSR based branch trace buffer 'confuser' ran between each int_sqrt() invocation. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171020164644.876503355@infradead.org Fixes: 30493cc9dddb ("lib/int_sqrt.c: optimize square root algorithm") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Anshul Garg <aksgarg1989@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Michael Davidson <md@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
2017-11-17 23:28:04 +00:00
while (m > x)
m >>= 2;
lib/int_sqrt.c: optimize square root algorithm Optimize the current version of the shift-and-subtract (hardware) algorithm, described by John von Newmann[1] and Guy L Steele. Iterating 1,000,000 times, perf shows for the current version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-curr' (10 runs): 27.170996 task-clock # 0.979 CPUs utilized ( +- 3.19% ) 3 context-switches # 0.103 K/sec ( +- 4.76% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.004 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec ( +- 0.16% ) 64,921,199 cycles # 2.389 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) 28,967,789 stalled-cycles-frontend # 44.62% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.18% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 104,502,623 instructions # 1.61 insns per cycle # 0.28 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.00% ) 34,088,368 branches # 1254.587 M/sec ( +- 0.00% ) 4,901 branch-misses # 0.01% of all branches ( +- 1.32% ) 0.027763015 seconds time elapsed ( +- 3.22% ) And for the new version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-new' (10 runs): 0.496869 task-clock # 0.519 CPUs utilized ( +- 2.38% ) 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec 0 cpu-migrations # 0.403 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.209 M/sec ( +- 0.15% ) 590,760 cycles # 1.189 GHz ( +- 2.35% ) 395,053 stalled-cycles-frontend # 66.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 3.67% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 398,963 instructions # 0.68 insns per cycle # 0.99 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.39% ) 70,228 branches # 141.341 M/sec ( +- 0.36% ) 3,364 branch-misses # 4.79% of all branches ( +- 5.45% ) 0.000957440 seconds time elapsed ( +- 2.42% ) Furthermore, this saves space in instruction text: text data bss dec hex filename 111 0 0 111 6f lib/int_sqrt-baseline.o 89 0 0 89 59 lib/int_sqrt.o [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Draft_of_a_Report_on_the_EDVAC Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Tested-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-04-29 23:18:09 +00:00
while (m != 0) {
b = y + m;
y >>= 1;
lib/int_sqrt.c: optimize square root algorithm Optimize the current version of the shift-and-subtract (hardware) algorithm, described by John von Newmann[1] and Guy L Steele. Iterating 1,000,000 times, perf shows for the current version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-curr' (10 runs): 27.170996 task-clock # 0.979 CPUs utilized ( +- 3.19% ) 3 context-switches # 0.103 K/sec ( +- 4.76% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.004 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec ( +- 0.16% ) 64,921,199 cycles # 2.389 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) 28,967,789 stalled-cycles-frontend # 44.62% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.18% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 104,502,623 instructions # 1.61 insns per cycle # 0.28 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.00% ) 34,088,368 branches # 1254.587 M/sec ( +- 0.00% ) 4,901 branch-misses # 0.01% of all branches ( +- 1.32% ) 0.027763015 seconds time elapsed ( +- 3.22% ) And for the new version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-new' (10 runs): 0.496869 task-clock # 0.519 CPUs utilized ( +- 2.38% ) 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec 0 cpu-migrations # 0.403 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.209 M/sec ( +- 0.15% ) 590,760 cycles # 1.189 GHz ( +- 2.35% ) 395,053 stalled-cycles-frontend # 66.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 3.67% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 398,963 instructions # 0.68 insns per cycle # 0.99 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.39% ) 70,228 branches # 141.341 M/sec ( +- 0.36% ) 3,364 branch-misses # 4.79% of all branches ( +- 5.45% ) 0.000957440 seconds time elapsed ( +- 2.42% ) Furthermore, this saves space in instruction text: text data bss dec hex filename 111 0 0 111 6f lib/int_sqrt-baseline.o 89 0 0 89 59 lib/int_sqrt.o [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Draft_of_a_Report_on_the_EDVAC Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Tested-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-04-29 23:18:09 +00:00
if (x >= b) {
x -= b;
y += m;
}
lib/int_sqrt.c: optimize square root algorithm Optimize the current version of the shift-and-subtract (hardware) algorithm, described by John von Newmann[1] and Guy L Steele. Iterating 1,000,000 times, perf shows for the current version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-curr' (10 runs): 27.170996 task-clock # 0.979 CPUs utilized ( +- 3.19% ) 3 context-switches # 0.103 K/sec ( +- 4.76% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.004 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec ( +- 0.16% ) 64,921,199 cycles # 2.389 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) 28,967,789 stalled-cycles-frontend # 44.62% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.18% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 104,502,623 instructions # 1.61 insns per cycle # 0.28 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.00% ) 34,088,368 branches # 1254.587 M/sec ( +- 0.00% ) 4,901 branch-misses # 0.01% of all branches ( +- 1.32% ) 0.027763015 seconds time elapsed ( +- 3.22% ) And for the new version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-new' (10 runs): 0.496869 task-clock # 0.519 CPUs utilized ( +- 2.38% ) 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec 0 cpu-migrations # 0.403 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.209 M/sec ( +- 0.15% ) 590,760 cycles # 1.189 GHz ( +- 2.35% ) 395,053 stalled-cycles-frontend # 66.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 3.67% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 398,963 instructions # 0.68 insns per cycle # 0.99 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.39% ) 70,228 branches # 141.341 M/sec ( +- 0.36% ) 3,364 branch-misses # 4.79% of all branches ( +- 5.45% ) 0.000957440 seconds time elapsed ( +- 2.42% ) Furthermore, this saves space in instruction text: text data bss dec hex filename 111 0 0 111 6f lib/int_sqrt-baseline.o 89 0 0 89 59 lib/int_sqrt.o [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Draft_of_a_Report_on_the_EDVAC Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Tested-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-04-29 23:18:09 +00:00
m >>= 2;
}
lib/int_sqrt.c: optimize square root algorithm Optimize the current version of the shift-and-subtract (hardware) algorithm, described by John von Newmann[1] and Guy L Steele. Iterating 1,000,000 times, perf shows for the current version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-curr' (10 runs): 27.170996 task-clock # 0.979 CPUs utilized ( +- 3.19% ) 3 context-switches # 0.103 K/sec ( +- 4.76% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.004 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec ( +- 0.16% ) 64,921,199 cycles # 2.389 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) 28,967,789 stalled-cycles-frontend # 44.62% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.18% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 104,502,623 instructions # 1.61 insns per cycle # 0.28 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.00% ) 34,088,368 branches # 1254.587 M/sec ( +- 0.00% ) 4,901 branch-misses # 0.01% of all branches ( +- 1.32% ) 0.027763015 seconds time elapsed ( +- 3.22% ) And for the new version: Performance counter stats for './sqrt-new' (10 runs): 0.496869 task-clock # 0.519 CPUs utilized ( +- 2.38% ) 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec 0 cpu-migrations # 0.403 K/sec ( +-100.00% ) 104 page-faults # 0.209 M/sec ( +- 0.15% ) 590,760 cycles # 1.189 GHz ( +- 2.35% ) 395,053 stalled-cycles-frontend # 66.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 3.67% ) <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend 398,963 instructions # 0.68 insns per cycle # 0.99 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.39% ) 70,228 branches # 141.341 M/sec ( +- 0.36% ) 3,364 branch-misses # 4.79% of all branches ( +- 5.45% ) 0.000957440 seconds time elapsed ( +- 2.42% ) Furthermore, this saves space in instruction text: text data bss dec hex filename 111 0 0 111 6f lib/int_sqrt-baseline.o 89 0 0 89 59 lib/int_sqrt.o [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Draft_of_a_Report_on_the_EDVAC Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Tested-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-04-29 23:18:09 +00:00
return y;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(int_sqrt);