Piteball
/
android_kernel_samsung_msm8976
mirror of https://github.com/team-infusion-developers/android_kernel_samsung_msm8976.git
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

af_key: unconditionally clone on broadcast 

Attempting to avoid cloning the skb when broadcasting by inflating
the refcount with sock_hold/sock_put while under RCU lock is dangerous
and violates RCU principles. It leads to subtle race conditions when
attempting to free the SKB, as we may reference sockets that have
already been freed by the stack.

Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6b6b6b6c4b
[006b6b6b6b6b6c4b] address between user and kernel address ranges
Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
task: fffffff78f65b380 task.stack: ffffff8049a88000
pc : sock_rfree+0x38/0x6c
lr : skb_release_head_state+0x6c/0xcc
Process repro (pid: 7117, stack limit = 0xffffff8049a88000)
Call trace:
	sock_rfree+0x38/0x6c
	skb_release_head_state+0x6c/0xcc
	skb_release_all+0x1c/0x38
	__kfree_skb+0x1c/0x30
	kfree_skb+0xd0/0xf4
	pfkey_broadcast+0x14c/0x18c
	pfkey_sendmsg+0x1d8/0x408
	sock_sendmsg+0x44/0x60
	___sys_sendmsg+0x1d0/0x2a8
	__sys_sendmsg+0x64/0xb4
	SyS_sendmsg+0x34/0x4c
	el0_svc_naked+0x34/0x38
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception

CRs-Fixed: 2251019
Change-Id: Ib3b01f941a34a7df61fe9445f746b7df33f4656a
Signed-off-by: Sean Tranchetti <stranche@codeaurora.org>
This commit is contained in:
Sean Tranchetti 2018-09-19 17:05:42 -06:00 committed by syphyr
parent f5cf52ee67
commit 0d2f1604f9
1 changed files with 16 additions and 26 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

42
net/key/af_key.c
View File

@ -187,30 +187,22 @@ static int pfkey_release(struct socket *sock)
return 0;
}
static int pfkey_broadcast_one(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sk_buff **skb2,
gfp_t allocation, struct sock *sk)
static int pfkey_broadcast_one(struct sk_buff *skb, gfp_t allocation,
struct sock *sk)
{
int err = -ENOBUFS;
sock_hold(sk);
if (*skb2 == NULL) {
if (atomic_read(&skb->users) != 1) {
*skb2 = skb_clone(skb, allocation);
} else {
*skb2 = skb;
atomic_inc(&skb->users);
}
if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) > sk->sk_rcvbuf)
return err;
skb = skb_clone(skb, allocation);
if (skb) {
skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
sk->sk_data_ready(sk, skb->len);
err = 0;
}
if (*skb2 != NULL) {
if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) <= sk->sk_rcvbuf) {
skb_set_owner_r(*skb2, sk);
skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, *skb2);
sk->sk_data_ready(sk, (*skb2)->len);
*skb2 = NULL;
err = 0;
}
}
sock_put(sk);
return err;
}
@ -225,7 +217,6 @@ static int pfkey_broadcast(struct sk_buff *skb, gfp_t allocation,
{
struct netns_pfkey *net_pfkey = net_generic(net, pfkey_net_id);
struct sock *sk;
struct sk_buff *skb2 = NULL;
int err = -ESRCH;
/* XXX Do we need something like netlink_overrun? I think
@ -244,7 +235,7 @@ static int pfkey_broadcast(struct sk_buff *skb, gfp_t allocation,
* socket.
*/
if (pfk->promisc)
pfkey_broadcast_one(skb, &skb2, allocation, sk);
pfkey_broadcast_one(skb, GFP_ATOMIC, sk);
/* the exact target will be processed later */
if (sk == one_sk)
@ -259,9 +250,9 @@ static int pfkey_broadcast(struct sk_buff *skb, gfp_t allocation,
continue;
}
err2 = pfkey_broadcast_one(skb, &skb2, allocation, sk);
err2 = pfkey_broadcast_one(skb, GFP_ATOMIC, sk);
/* Error is cleare after succecful sending to at least one
/* Error is cleared after successful sending to at least one
* registered KM */
if ((broadcast_flags & BROADCAST_REGISTERED) && err)
err = err2;
@ -269,9 +260,8 @@ static int pfkey_broadcast(struct sk_buff *skb, gfp_t allocation,
rcu_read_unlock();
if (one_sk != NULL)
err = pfkey_broadcast_one(skb, &skb2, allocation, one_sk);
err = pfkey_broadcast_one(skb, allocation, one_sk);
kfree_skb(skb2);
kfree_skb(skb);
return err;
}