dlm: fix waiter recovery

An outstanding remote operation (an lkb on the "waiter"
list) could sometimes miss being resent during recovery.
The decision was based on the lkb_nodeid field, which
could have changed during an earlier aborted recovery,
so it no longer represents the actual remote destination.
The lkb_wait_nodeid is always the actual remote node,
so it is the best value to use.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Teigland 2012-04-23 12:18:18 -05:00
parent 513ef596d4
commit 13ef11110f
1 changed files with 31 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -4187,15 +4187,19 @@ static void recover_convert_waiter(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb,
/* A waiting lkb needs recovery if the master node has failed, or
the master node is changing (only when no directory is used) */
static int waiter_needs_recovery(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
static int waiter_needs_recovery(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb,
int dir_nodeid)
{
if (dlm_is_removed(ls, lkb->lkb_nodeid))
if (dlm_is_removed(ls, lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid))
return 1;
if (!dlm_no_directory(ls))
return 0;
if (dlm_dir_nodeid(lkb->lkb_resource) != lkb->lkb_nodeid)
if (dir_nodeid == dlm_our_nodeid())
return 1;
if (dir_nodeid != lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid)
return 1;
return 0;
@ -4212,6 +4216,7 @@ void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls)
struct dlm_lkb *lkb, *safe;
struct dlm_message *ms_stub;
int wait_type, stub_unlock_result, stub_cancel_result;
int dir_nodeid;
ms_stub = kmalloc(sizeof(struct dlm_message), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ms_stub) {
@ -4223,13 +4228,21 @@ void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls)
list_for_each_entry_safe(lkb, safe, &ls->ls_waiters, lkb_wait_reply) {
dir_nodeid = dlm_dir_nodeid(lkb->lkb_resource);
/* exclude debug messages about unlocks because there can be so
many and they aren't very interesting */
if (lkb->lkb_wait_type != DLM_MSG_UNLOCK) {
log_debug(ls, "recover_waiter %x nodeid %d "
"msg %d to %d", lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_nodeid,
lkb->lkb_wait_type, lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid);
log_debug(ls, "waiter %x remote %x msg %d r_nodeid %d "
"lkb_nodeid %d wait_nodeid %d dir_nodeid %d",
lkb->lkb_id,
lkb->lkb_remid,
lkb->lkb_wait_type,
lkb->lkb_resource->res_nodeid,
lkb->lkb_nodeid,
lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid,
dir_nodeid);
}
/* all outstanding lookups, regardless of destination will be
@ -4240,7 +4253,7 @@ void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls)
continue;
}
if (!waiter_needs_recovery(ls, lkb))
if (!waiter_needs_recovery(ls, lkb, dir_nodeid))
continue;
wait_type = lkb->lkb_wait_type;
@ -4373,8 +4386,11 @@ int dlm_recover_waiters_post(struct dlm_ls *ls)
ou = is_overlap_unlock(lkb);
err = 0;
log_debug(ls, "recover_waiter %x nodeid %d msg %d r_nodeid %d",
lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_nodeid, mstype, r->res_nodeid);
log_debug(ls, "waiter %x remote %x msg %d r_nodeid %d "
"lkb_nodeid %d wait_nodeid %d dir_nodeid %d "
"overlap %d %d", lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_remid, mstype,
r->res_nodeid, lkb->lkb_nodeid, lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid,
dlm_dir_nodeid(r), oc, ou);
/* At this point we assume that we won't get a reply to any
previous op or overlap op on this lock. First, do a big
@ -4426,9 +4442,12 @@ int dlm_recover_waiters_post(struct dlm_ls *ls)
}
}
if (err)
log_error(ls, "recover_waiters_post %x %d %x %d %d",
lkb->lkb_id, mstype, lkb->lkb_flags, oc, ou);
if (err) {
log_error(ls, "waiter %x msg %d r_nodeid %d "
"dir_nodeid %d overlap %d %d",
lkb->lkb_id, mstype, r->res_nodeid,
dlm_dir_nodeid(r), oc, ou);
}
unlock_rsb(r);
put_rsb(r);
dlm_put_lkb(lkb);