perf, x86: Fix BTS condition

Currently the x86 backend incorrectly assumes that any BRANCH_INSN
with sample_period==1 is a BTS request. This is not true when we do
frequency driven profiling such as 'perf record -e branches'.

Solves this error:

  $ perf record -e branches ./array
  Error: sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 95 (Operation not supported).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-rd2y4ct71hjawzz6fpvsy9hg@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra 2011-04-26 13:24:33 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent cd2e49e90f
commit 18a073a3ac
2 changed files with 5 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -613,8 +613,8 @@ static int x86_setup_perfctr(struct perf_event *event)
/*
* Branch tracing:
*/
if ((attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS) &&
(hwc->sample_period == 1)) {
if (attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS &&
!attr->freq && hwc->sample_period == 1) {
/* BTS is not supported by this architecture. */
if (!x86_pmu.bts_active)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;

View File

@ -998,6 +998,9 @@ intel_bts_constraints(struct perf_event *event)
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
unsigned int hw_event, bts_event;
if (event->attr.freq)
return NULL;
hw_event = hwc->config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK;
bts_event = x86_pmu.event_map(PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS);