dm array: fix a reference counting bug in shadow_ablock

commit ed9571f0cf1fe09d3506302610f3ccdfa1d22c4a upstream.

An old array block could have its reference count decremented below
zero when it is being replaced in the btree by a new array block.

The fix is to increment the old ablock's reference count just before
inserting a new ablock into the btree.

Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Joe Thornber 2013-12-13 14:55:55 +00:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 20d68d38ef
commit 1cfc455291
1 changed files with 9 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -317,8 +317,16 @@ static int shadow_ablock(struct dm_array_info *info, dm_block_t *root,
* The shadow op will often be a noop. Only insert if it really
* copied data.
*/
if (dm_block_location(*block) != b)
if (dm_block_location(*block) != b) {
/*
* dm_tm_shadow_block will have already decremented the old
* block, but it is still referenced by the btree. We
* increment to stop the insert decrementing it below zero
* when overwriting the old value.
*/
dm_tm_inc(info->btree_info.tm, b);
r = insert_ablock(info, index, *block, root);
}
return r;
}