From 693f66d6213c20cc83a33ef18e8ae01d78883e3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 16:04:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] 9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC commit a84b69cb6e0a41e86bc593904faa6def3b957343 upstream. If we'd already sent a request and decide to abort it, we *must* issue TFLUSH properly and not just blindly reuse the tag, or we'll get seriously screwed when response eventually arrives and we confuse it for response to later request that had reused the same tag. Signed-off-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/9p/client.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c index addc116cecf0..853d62327a58 100644 --- a/net/9p/client.c +++ b/net/9p/client.c @@ -828,7 +828,8 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, if (err < 0) { if (err == -EIO) c->status = Disconnected; - goto reterr; + if (err != -ERESTARTSYS) + goto reterr; } if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_ERROR) { p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "req_status error %d\n", req->t_err);