mirror of
https://github.com/team-infusion-developers/android_kernel_samsung_msm8976.git
synced 2024-11-07 04:09:21 +00:00
mmc: documentation of mmc non-blocking request usage and design.
Documentation about the background and the design of mmc non-blocking. Host driver guidelines to minimize request preparation overhead. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
101ed47e01
commit
7937e878f9
2 changed files with 89 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -4,3 +4,5 @@ mmc-dev-attrs.txt
|
|||
- info on SD and MMC device attributes
|
||||
mmc-dev-parts.txt
|
||||
- info on SD and MMC device partitions
|
||||
mmc-async-req.txt
|
||||
- info on mmc asynchronous requests
|
||||
|
|
87
Documentation/mmc/mmc-async-req.txt
Normal file
87
Documentation/mmc/mmc-async-req.txt
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
|||
Rationale
|
||||
=========
|
||||
|
||||
How significant is the cache maintenance overhead?
|
||||
It depends. Fast eMMC and multiple cache levels with speculative cache
|
||||
pre-fetch makes the cache overhead relatively significant. If the DMA
|
||||
preparations for the next request are done in parallel with the current
|
||||
transfer, the DMA preparation overhead would not affect the MMC performance.
|
||||
The intention of non-blocking (asynchronous) MMC requests is to minimize the
|
||||
time between when an MMC request ends and another MMC request begins.
|
||||
Using mmc_wait_for_req(), the MMC controller is idle while dma_map_sg and
|
||||
dma_unmap_sg are processing. Using non-blocking MMC requests makes it
|
||||
possible to prepare the caches for next job in parallel with an active
|
||||
MMC request.
|
||||
|
||||
MMC block driver
|
||||
================
|
||||
|
||||
The mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() in the MMC block driver is made non-blocking.
|
||||
The increase in throughput is proportional to the time it takes to
|
||||
prepare (major part of preparations are dma_map_sg() and dma_unmap_sg())
|
||||
a request and how fast the memory is. The faster the MMC/SD is the
|
||||
more significant the prepare request time becomes. Roughly the expected
|
||||
performance gain is 5% for large writes and 10% on large reads on a L2 cache
|
||||
platform. In power save mode, when clocks run on a lower frequency, the DMA
|
||||
preparation may cost even more. As long as these slower preparations are run
|
||||
in parallel with the transfer performance won't be affected.
|
||||
|
||||
Details on measurements from IOZone and mmc_test
|
||||
================================================
|
||||
|
||||
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Specs/StoragePerfMMC-async-req
|
||||
|
||||
MMC core API extension
|
||||
======================
|
||||
|
||||
There is one new public function mmc_start_req().
|
||||
It starts a new MMC command request for a host. The function isn't
|
||||
truly non-blocking. If there is an ongoing async request it waits
|
||||
for completion of that request and starts the new one and returns. It
|
||||
doesn't wait for the new request to complete. If there is no ongoing
|
||||
request it starts the new request and returns immediately.
|
||||
|
||||
MMC host extensions
|
||||
===================
|
||||
|
||||
There are two optional members in the mmc_host_ops -- pre_req() and
|
||||
post_req() -- that the host driver may implement in order to move work
|
||||
to before and after the actual mmc_host_ops.request() function is called.
|
||||
In the DMA case pre_req() may do dma_map_sg() and prepare the DMA
|
||||
descriptor, and post_req() runs the dma_unmap_sg().
|
||||
|
||||
Optimize for the first request
|
||||
==============================
|
||||
|
||||
The first request in a series of requests can't be prepared in parallel
|
||||
with the previous transfer, since there is no previous request.
|
||||
The argument is_first_req in pre_req() indicates that there is no previous
|
||||
request. The host driver may optimize for this scenario to minimize
|
||||
the performance loss. A way to optimize for this is to split the current
|
||||
request in two chunks, prepare the first chunk and start the request,
|
||||
and finally prepare the second chunk and start the transfer.
|
||||
|
||||
Pseudocode to handle is_first_req scenario with minimal prepare overhead:
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_first_req && req->size > threshold)
|
||||
/* start MMC transfer for the complete transfer size */
|
||||
mmc_start_command(MMC_CMD_TRANSFER_FULL_SIZE);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Begin to prepare DMA while cmd is being processed by MMC.
|
||||
* The first chunk of the request should take the same time
|
||||
* to prepare as the "MMC process command time".
|
||||
* If prepare time exceeds MMC cmd time
|
||||
* the transfer is delayed, guesstimate max 4k as first chunk size.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
prepare_1st_chunk_for_dma(req);
|
||||
/* flush pending desc to the DMAC (dmaengine.h) */
|
||||
dma_issue_pending(req->dma_desc);
|
||||
|
||||
prepare_2nd_chunk_for_dma(req);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The second issue_pending should be called before MMC runs out
|
||||
* of the first chunk. If the MMC runs out of the first data chunk
|
||||
* before this call, the transfer is delayed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
dma_issue_pending(req->dma_desc);
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue