mirror of
https://github.com/team-infusion-developers/android_kernel_samsung_msm8976.git
synced 2024-10-31 18:09:19 +00:00
compaction: checks correct fragmentation index
fragmentation_index() returns -1000 when the allocation might succeed This doesn't match the comment and code in compaction_suitable(). I thought compaction_suitable should return COMPACT_PARTIAL in -1000 case, because in this case allocation could succeed depending on watermarks. The impact of this is that compaction starts and compact_finished() is called which rechecks the watermarks and the free lists. It should have the same result in that compaction should not start but is more expensive. Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5db8a73a8d
commit
a582a738c7
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -480,7 +480,8 @@ unsigned long compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order)
|
|||
* fragmentation index determines if allocation failures are due to
|
||||
* low memory or external fragmentation
|
||||
*
|
||||
* index of -1 implies allocations might succeed dependingon watermarks
|
||||
* index of -1000 implies allocations might succeed depending on
|
||||
* watermarks
|
||||
* index towards 0 implies failure is due to lack of memory
|
||||
* index towards 1000 implies failure is due to fragmentation
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -490,7 +491,8 @@ unsigned long compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order)
|
|||
if (fragindex >= 0 && fragindex <= sysctl_extfrag_threshold)
|
||||
return COMPACT_SKIPPED;
|
||||
|
||||
if (fragindex == -1 && zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, watermark, 0, 0))
|
||||
if (fragindex == -1000 && zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, watermark,
|
||||
0, 0))
|
||||
return COMPACT_PARTIAL;
|
||||
|
||||
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue