mirror of
https://github.com/team-infusion-developers/android_kernel_samsung_msm8976.git
synced 2024-11-07 04:09:21 +00:00
PM: Runtime PM documentation update
This patch (as1318) updates the runtime PM documentation, adding a section discussing the interaction between runtime PM and system sleep. [rjw: Rebased and made it agree with the other updates better.] Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6ab7aa9f4
commit
f1212ae133
1 changed files with 50 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -381,3 +381,53 @@ incremented by the core before executing ->probe() and ->remove(). Still, it
|
|||
may be desirable to suspend the device as soon as ->probe() or ->remove() has
|
||||
finished, so the PM core uses pm_runtime_idle_sync() to invoke the
|
||||
subsystem-level idle callback for the device at that time.
|
||||
|
||||
6. Run-time PM and System Sleep
|
||||
|
||||
Run-time PM and system sleep (i.e., system suspend and hibernation, also known
|
||||
as suspend-to-RAM and suspend-to-disk) interact with each other in a couple of
|
||||
ways. If a device is active when a system sleep starts, everything is
|
||||
straightforward. But what should happen if the device is already suspended?
|
||||
|
||||
The device may have different wake-up settings for run-time PM and system sleep.
|
||||
For example, remote wake-up may be enabled for run-time suspend but disallowed
|
||||
for system sleep (device_may_wakeup(dev) returns 'false'). When this happens,
|
||||
the subsystem-level system suspend callback is responsible for changing the
|
||||
device's wake-up setting (it may leave that to the device driver's system
|
||||
suspend routine). It may be necessary to resume the device and suspend it again
|
||||
in order to do so. The same is true if the driver uses different power levels
|
||||
or other settings for run-time suspend and system sleep.
|
||||
|
||||
During system resume, devices generally should be brought back to full power,
|
||||
even if they were suspended before the system sleep began. There are several
|
||||
reasons for this, including:
|
||||
|
||||
* The device might need to switch power levels, wake-up settings, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
* Remote wake-up events might have been lost by the firmware.
|
||||
|
||||
* The device's children may need the device to be at full power in order
|
||||
to resume themselves.
|
||||
|
||||
* The driver's idea of the device state may not agree with the device's
|
||||
physical state. This can happen during resume from hibernation.
|
||||
|
||||
* The device might need to be reset.
|
||||
|
||||
* Even though the device was suspended, if its usage counter was > 0 then most
|
||||
likely it would need a run-time resume in the near future anyway.
|
||||
|
||||
* Always going back to full power is simplest.
|
||||
|
||||
If the device was suspended before the sleep began, then its run-time PM status
|
||||
will have to be updated to reflect the actual post-system sleep status. The way
|
||||
to do this is:
|
||||
|
||||
pm_runtime_disable(dev);
|
||||
pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
|
||||
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
|
||||
|
||||
The PM core always increments the run-time usage counter before calling the
|
||||
->prepare() callback and decrements it after calling the ->complete() callback.
|
||||
Hence disabling run-time PM temporarily like this will not cause any run-time
|
||||
suspend callbacks to be lost.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue