mirror of
https://github.com/team-infusion-developers/android_kernel_samsung_msm8976.git
synced 2024-10-31 18:09:19 +00:00
block: blk_max_pfn is somtimes wrong
There is a small problem in handling page bounce. At the moment blk_max_pfn equals max_pfn, which is in fact not maximum possible _number_ of a page frame, but the _amount_ of page frames. For example for the 32bit x86 node with 4Gb RAM, max_pfn = 0x100000, but not 0xFFFF. request_queue structure has a member q->bounce_pfn and queue needs bounce pages for the pages _above_ this limit. This routine is handled by blk_queue_bounce(), where the following check is produced: if (q->bounce_pfn >= blk_max_pfn) return; Assume, that a driver has set q->bounce_pfn to 0xFFFF, but blk_max_pfn equals 0x10000. In such situation the check above fails and for each bio we always fall down for iterating over pages tied to the bio. I want to notice, that for quite a big range of device drivers (ide, md, ...) such problem doesn't happen because they use BLK_BOUNCE_ANY for bounce_pfn. BLK_BOUNCE_ANY is defined as blk_max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, and then the check above doesn't fail. But for other drivers, which obtain reuired value from drivers, it fails. For example sata_nv uses ATA_DMA_MASK or dev->dma_mask. I propose to use (max_pfn - 1) for blk_max_pfn. And the same for blk_max_low_pfn. The patch also cleanses some checks related with bounce_pfn. Signed-off-by: Vasily Tarasov <vtaras@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
703071b5b9
commit
f772b3d9ca
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -1221,7 +1221,7 @@ void blk_recount_segments(request_queue_t *q, struct bio *bio)
|
|||
* considered part of another segment, since that might
|
||||
* change with the bounce page.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
high = page_to_pfn(bv->bv_page) >= q->bounce_pfn;
|
||||
high = page_to_pfn(bv->bv_page) > q->bounce_pfn;
|
||||
if (high || highprv)
|
||||
goto new_hw_segment;
|
||||
if (cluster) {
|
||||
|
@ -3658,8 +3658,8 @@ int __init blk_dev_init(void)
|
|||
open_softirq(BLOCK_SOFTIRQ, blk_done_softirq, NULL);
|
||||
register_hotcpu_notifier(&blk_cpu_notifier);
|
||||
|
||||
blk_max_low_pfn = max_low_pfn;
|
||||
blk_max_pfn = max_pfn;
|
||||
blk_max_low_pfn = max_low_pfn - 1;
|
||||
blk_max_pfn = max_pfn - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static void __blk_queue_bounce(request_queue_t *q, struct bio **bio_orig,
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* is destination page below bounce pfn?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (page_to_pfn(page) < q->bounce_pfn)
|
||||
if (page_to_pfn(page) <= q->bounce_pfn)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue