First, we shouldn't care here about the structure of the opaque part of
the stateid. Second, this hash is really dumb. (I'm not sure the
replacement is much better, though--to look at it another patch.)
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
We want delegations to share more with open/lock stateid's, so first
we'll pull out some of the common stuff we want to share.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Move most of this into helper functions. Also move the non-CONFIRM case
into caller, providing a helper function for that purpose.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The stateowner has some fields that only make sense for openowners, and
some that only make sense for lockowners, and I find it a lot clearer if
those are separated out.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Move the CLOSE_STATE case into the unique caller that cares about it
rather than putting it in preprocess_seqid_op.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
I don't see the point of having this check in nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op()
when it's only needed by the one caller.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
If open fails with any error other than nfserr_replay_me, then the main
nfsd4_proc_compound() loop continues unconditionally to
nfsd4_encode_operation(), which will always call encode_seqid_op_tail.
Thus the condition we check for here does not occur.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
There are currently a couple races in the seqid replay code: a
retransmission could come while we're still encoding the original reply,
or a new seqid-mutating call could come as we're encoding a replay.
So, extend the state lock over the encoding (both encoding of a replayed
reply and caching of the original encoded reply).
I really hate doing this, and previously added the stateowner
reference-counting code to avoid it (which was insufficient)--but I
don't see a less complicated alternative at the moment.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Now that the replay owner is in the cstate we can remove it from a lot
of other individual operations and further simplify
nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op().
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Set the stateowner associated with a replay in one spot in
nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op() and keep it in cstate. This allows removing
a few lines of boilerplate from all the nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op()
callers.
Also turn ENCODE_SEQID_OP_TAIL into a function while we're here.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Thanks to Casey for reminding me that 5661 gives a special meaning to a
value of 0 in the stateid's seqid field, so all stateid's should start
out with si_generation 1. We were doing that in the open and lock
cases for minorversion 1, but not for the delegation stateid, and not
for openstateid's with v4.0.
It doesn't *really* matter much for v4.0 or for delegation stateid's
(which never get the seqid field incremented), but we may as well do the
same for all of them.
Reported-by: Casey Bodley <cbodley@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Follow the recommendation from rfc3530bis for stateid generation number
wraparound, simplify some code, and fix or remove incorrect comments.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The values here represent highest slotid numbers. Since slotid's are
numbered starting from zero, the highest should be one less than the
number of slots.
Reported-by: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
When called with OPEN_STATE, preprocess_seqid_op only returns an open
stateid, hence only an open owner.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
We've got some lock-specific code here in nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op which
is only used by nfsd4_lock(). Move it to the caller.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Note that the special handling for the lock stateid case is already done
by nfs4_check_openmode() (as of 0292191417
"nfsd4: fix openmode checking on IO using lock stateid") so we no longer
need these two cases in the caller.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Share some common code, stop doing silly things like initializing a list
head immediately before adding it to a list, etc.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
These appear to be generic (for both open and lock owners), but they're
actually just for open owners. This has confused me more than once.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The server is returning nfserr_resource for both permanent errors and
for errors (like allocation failures) that might be resolved by retrying
later. Save nfserr_resource for the former and use delay/jukebox for
the latter.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Even if we fail to write a recovery record, we should still mark the
client as having acquired its first state. Otherwise we leave 4.1
clients with indefinite ERR_GRACE returns.
However, an inability to write stable storage records may cause failures
of reboot recovery, and the problem should still be brought to the
server administrator's attention.
So, make sure the error is logged.
These errors shouldn't normally be triggered on a corectly functioning
server--this isn't a case where a misconfigured client could spam the
logs.
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
A client that wants to execute a file must be able to read it. Read
opens over nfs are therefore implicitly allowed for executable files
even when those files are not readable.
NFSv2/v3 get this right by using a passed-in NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE on
read requests, but NFSv4 has gotten this wrong ever since
dc730e1737 "nfsd4: fix owner-override on
open", when we realized that the file owner shouldn't override
permissions on non-reclaim NFSv4 opens.
So we can't use NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE to tell nfsd_permission to allow
reads of executable files.
So, do the same thing we do whenever we encounter another weird NFS
permission nit: define yet another NFSD_MAY_* flag.
The industry's future standardization on 128-bit processors will be
motivated primarily by the need for integers with enough bits for all
the NFSD_MAY_* flags.
Reported-by: Leonardo Borda <leonardoborda@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The nfsd4 code has a bunch of special exceptions for error returns which
map nfserr_symlink to other errors.
In fact, the spec makes it clear that nfserr_symlink is to be preferred
over less specific errors where possible.
The patch that introduced it back in 2.6.4 is "kNFSd: correct symlink
related error returns.", which claims that these special exceptions are
represent an NFSv4 break from v2/v3 tradition--when in fact the symlink
error was introduced with v4.
I suspect what happened was pynfs tests were written that were overly
faithful to the (known-incomplete) rfc3530 error return lists, and then
code was fixed up mindlessly to make the tests pass.
Delete these unnecessary exceptions.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Zero means "I don't care what kind of file this is". And that's
probably what we want--acls are also settable at least on directories,
and if the filesystem doesn't want them on other objects, leave it to it
to complain.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
We allow the fh_verify caller to specify that any object *except* those
of a given type is allowed, by passing a negative type. But only one
caller actually uses it. Open-code that check in the one caller.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
