mirror of
https://github.com/team-infusion-developers/android_kernel_samsung_msm8976.git
synced 2024-11-05 18:59:58 +00:00
f7b3a4359b
Problem: In some circumstances, bd_claim() is returning the wrong error code. If we try to swapon an unused block device that isn't swap formatted, we get -EINVAL. But if that same block device is already mounted, we instead get -EBUSY, even though it still isn't a valid swap device. This issue came up on the busybox list trying to get the error message from "swapon -a" right. If a swap device is already enabled, we get -EBUSY, and we shouldn't report this as an error. But we can't distinguish the two -EBUSY conditions, which are very different errors. In the code, bd_claim() returns either 0 or -EBUSY, but in this case busy means "somebody other than sys_swapon has already claimed this", and _that_ means this block device can't be a valid swap device. So return -EINVAL there. Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
bootmem.c | ||
fadvise.c | ||
filemap.c | ||
filemap.h | ||
filemap_xip.c | ||
fremap.c | ||
highmem.c | ||
hugetlb.c | ||
internal.h | ||
Kconfig | ||
madvise.c | ||
Makefile | ||
memory.c | ||
mempolicy.c | ||
mempool.c | ||
mincore.c | ||
mlock.c | ||
mmap.c | ||
mprotect.c | ||
mremap.c | ||
msync.c | ||
nommu.c | ||
oom_kill.c | ||
page-writeback.c | ||
page_alloc.c | ||
page_io.c | ||
pdflush.c | ||
prio_tree.c | ||
readahead.c | ||
rmap.c | ||
shmem.c | ||
slab.c | ||
sparse.c | ||
swap.c | ||
swap_state.c | ||
swapfile.c | ||
thrash.c | ||
tiny-shmem.c | ||
truncate.c | ||
vmalloc.c | ||
vmscan.c |