63946e8616
commit 7bd36014460f793c19e7d6c94dab67b0afcfcb7f upstream.
Gerlando Falauto reported that when HRTICK is enabled, it is
possible to trigger system deadlocks. These were hard to
reproduce, as HRTICK has been broken in the past, but seemed
to be connected to the timekeeping_seq lock.
Since seqlock/seqcount's aren't supported w/ lockdep, I added
some extra spinlock based locking and triggered the following
lockdep output:
[ 15.849182] ntpd/4062 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 15.849765] (&(&pool->lock)->rlock){..-...}, at: [<ffffffff810aa9b5>] __queue_work+0x145/0x480
[ 15.850051]
[ 15.850051] but task is already holding lock:
[ 15.850051] (timekeeper_lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff810df6df>] do_adjtimex+0x7f/0x100
<snip>
[ 15.850051] Chain exists of: &(&pool->lock)->rlock --> &p->pi_lock --> timekeeper_lock
[ 15.850051] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 15.850051]
[ 15.850051] CPU0 CPU1
[ 15.850051] ---- ----
[ 15.850051] lock(timekeeper_lock);
[ 15.850051] lock(&p->pi_lock);
[ 15.850051] lock(timekeeper_lock);
[ 15.850051] lock(&(&pool->lock)->rlock);
[ 15.850051]
[ 15.850051] *** DEADLOCK ***
The deadlock was introduced by
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
Kconfig | ||
Makefile | ||
alarmtimer.c | ||
clockevents.c | ||
clocksource.c | ||
jiffies.c | ||
ntp.c | ||
ntp_internal.h | ||
posix-clock.c | ||
tick-broadcast.c | ||
tick-common.c | ||
tick-internal.h | ||
tick-oneshot.c | ||
tick-sched.c | ||
timeconv.c | ||
timekeeping.c | ||
timer_list.c | ||
timer_stats.c |